The United States presidential election of 1860 set the stage for the American Civil War. The nation had been divided throughout most of the 1850s on questions of states' rights and slavery in the territories. In 1860, this issue finally came to a head, fracturing the formerly dominant Democratic Party into Southern and Northern factions and bringing Abraham Lincoln and the Republican Party to power without the support of a single Southern state.
Hardly more than a month following Lincoln's victory came declarations of secession by South Carolina and other states, which were rejected as illegal by the then-current President, James Buchanan and President-elect Abraham Lincoln.
- 1 Background
- 2 Nominations
- 3 Campaign
- 4 Results
- 5 Results by state
- 6 See also
- 7 Notes
- 8 References
- 9 Bibliography
- 10 External links
Background[edit | edit source]
After the Mexican-American War, the issue of slavery in the new territories led to the Compromise of 1850. While the compromise averted an immediate political crisis, it did not permanently resolve the issue of The Slave Power (the power of slaveholders to control the national government).
Amid the emergence of increasingly virulent and hostile sectional ideologies in national politics, the collapse of the old Second Party System in the 1850s hampered efforts of the politicians to reach yet another compromise. The result was the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which alienated Northerners and Southerners alike. With the rise of the Republican Party, the first truly sectional major party, the industrializing North and agrarian Midwest became committed to the economic ethos of free-labor industrial capitalism.
Nominations[edit | edit source]
Northern Democratic Party nomination[edit | edit source]
Northern Democratic candidates:
- Stephen A. Douglas, U.S. senator from Illinois
- James Guthrie, former U.S. Treasury Secretary from Kentucky
- Robert M. T. Hunter, U.S. senator from Virginia
- Joseph Lane, U.S. senator from Oregon
- Daniel S. Dickinson, former U.S. senator from New York
- Andrew Johnson, U.S. senator from Tennessee
Candidates gallery[edit | edit source]
The Democratic Party was divided over the issue of slavery. At the convention in Charleston in April 1860, 51 Southern Democrats walked out over a platform dispute, led by William Lowndes Yancey. Yancey and the Alabama delegation left the hall and they were followed by the delegates of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, three of the four delegates from Arkansas, and one of the three delegates from Delaware.
Six candidates were nominated: Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, James Guthrie of Kentucky, Robert Mercer Taliaferro Hunter of Virginia, Joseph Lane of Oregon, Daniel S. Dickinson of New York, and Andrew Johnson of Tennessee. Douglas, a moderate on the slavery issue who favored "popular sovereignty", was ahead on the first ballot, needing 56.5 more votes. On the 57th ballot, Douglas was still ahead, but still 50.5 votes short of nomination. In desperation, on May 3 the delegates agreed to stop voting and adjourn the convention.
|Charleston Presidential Ballot|
|Stephen A. Douglas||145.5||147||148.5||149||149.5||149.5||150.5||150.5||150.5||150.5||150.5||150.5||149.5||150||150||150||150||150||150||150||150.5||150.5||152.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5|
|Robert M. T. Hunter||42||41.5||36||41.5||41||41||41||40.5||39.5||39||38||38||28.5||27||26.5||26||26||26||26||26||26||26||25||25||35||25||25||25||25|
|Daniel S. Dickinson||7||6.5||6.5||5||5||3||4||4.5||1||4||4||4||1||0.5||0.5||0.5||0.5||1||1||0.5||0.5||0.5||0.5||1.5||1.5||12||12||12.5||13|
|James A. Pearce||1||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|Charleston Presidential Ballot|
|Stephen A. Douglas||151.5||151.5||152.5||152.5||152.5||152||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5||151.5|
|Robert M. T. Hunter||25||32.5||22.5||22.5||22.5||22||22||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||16||20.5||16||16||16|
|Daniel S. Dickinson||13||3||3||3||5||4.5||4.5||5.5||5.5||5.5||5.5||5||5||5||5||5||5||5||5||4||4||4||4||4||2||4||4||4|
|James A. Pearce||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
The Democrats convened again at the Front Street Theater in Baltimore, Maryland on June 18. This time 110 southern delegates (led by “Fire-Eaters”) walked out when the convention would not adopt a resolution supporting extending slavery into territories whose voters did not want it. After two ballots, the remaining Democrats nominated the ticket of Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois for President. Benjamin Fitzpatrick was nominated for vice president, but he refused the nomination. The nomination ultimately went to Herschel Vespasian Johnson of Georgia.
|Baltimore Presidential Ballot|
|Stephen A. Douglas||173.5||181.5|
|John C. Breckinridge||5||7.5|
|Thomas S. Bocock||1||0|
|Daniel S. Dickinson||0.5||0|
|Henry A. Wise||0.5||0|
Constitutional Union Party nomination[edit | edit source]
Constitutional Union candidates:
- John Bell, former U.S. senator from Tennessee
- Sam Houston, governor of Texas
- John J. Crittenden, U.S. senator from Kentucky
- Edward Everett, former U.S. senator from Massachusetts
- William A. Graham, former U.S. senator from North Carolina
- John McLean, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice from Ohio
Candidates gallery[edit | edit source]
Die-hard former Whigs and Know Nothings who felt they could support neither the Democratic Party nor the Republican Party formed the Constitutional Union Party, nominating John Bell of Tennessee for president over Governor Sam Houston of Texas on the second ballot. Edward Everett was nominated for vice president at the convention in Baltimore on May 9, 1860 (one week before Lincoln was nominated).
John Bell was a former Whig who had opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Lecompton Constitution. Edward Everett had been president of Harvard University and Secretary of State in the Fillmore administration. The party platform advocated compromise to save the Union, with the slogan "the Union as it is, and the Constitution as it is."
|John J. Crittenden||28||1|
|William A. Graham||22||18|
|William C. Rives||13||0|
|John M. Botts||9.5||7|
|William L. Sharkey||7||8.5|
|William L. Goggin||3||0|
Republican Party nomination[edit | edit source]
- Abraham Lincoln, former U.S. representative from Illinois
- William H. Seward, U.S. senator from New York
- Simon Cameron, U.S. senator from Pennsylvania
- Salmon P. Chase, former U.S. senator and governor from Ohio
- Edward Bates, former U.S. representative from Missouri
Candidates gallery[edit | edit source]
The Republican National Convention met in mid-May, after the Democrats had been forced to adjourn their convention in Charleston. With the Democrats in disarray and with a sweep of the Northern states possible, the Republicans were confident going into their convention in Chicago. William H. Seward of New York was considered the front runner, followed by Abraham Lincoln of Illinois, Salmon P. Chase of Ohio, and Missouri's Edward Bates.
As the convention developed, however, it was revealed that Seward, Chase, and Bates had each alienated factions of the Republican Party. Delegates were concerned that Seward was too closely identified with the radical wing of the party, and his moves toward the center had alienated the radicals. Chase, a former Democrat, had alienated many of the former Whigs by his coalition with the Democrats in the late 1840s, had opposed tariffs demanded by Pennsylvania, and critically, had opposition from his own delegation from Ohio. Bates outlined his positions on extension of slavery into the territories and equal constitutional rights for all citizens, positions that alienated his supporters in the border states and southern conservatives. German Americans in the party opposed Bates because of his past association with the Know Nothings.
Since it was essential to carry the West, and because Lincoln had a national reputation from his debates and speeches as the most articulate moderate, he won the party's nomination on the third ballot on May 18, 1860. Senator Hannibal Hamlin of Maine was nominated for vice president, defeating Cassius Clay of Kentucky.
|William H. Seward||173.5||184.5||180||111.5|
|Salmon P. Chase||49||42.5||24.5||2|
|William L. Dayton||14||10||1||1|
|Benjamin F. Wade||3||0||0||0|
|Cassius M. Clay||0||2||1||1|
|John C. Fremont||1||0||0||0|
|John M. Read||1||0||0||0|
|Vice Presidential Ballot|
|Cassius M. Clay||100.5||86|
|Andrew Horatio Reeder||51||0|
|Nathaniel Prentice Banks||38.5||0|
|Henry Winter Davis||8||0|
|William L. Dayton||3||0|
|John M. Reed||1||0|
The party platform clearly stated that slavery would not be allowed to spread any further, and it also promised that tariffs protecting industry would be imposed, a Homestead Act granting free farmland in the West to settlers, and the funding of a transcontinental railroad. All of these provisions were highly unpopular in the South.
Southern Democratic Party nomination[edit | edit source]
Southern Democratic candidates:
- John C. Breckinridge, U.S. Vice President from Kentucky
- Daniel S. Dickinson, former U.S. senator from New York
Candidates gallery[edit | edit source]
The Southern Democrats, led by Yancey, reconvened in Richmond, Virginia, and on June 28 nominated the pro-slavery incumbent Vice President, John Cabell Breckinridge of Kentucky, for President, and Joseph Lane of Oregon for Vice President at the Maryland Institute, in Baltimore.
|Southern Presidential Ballot|
|John C. Breckinridge||81|
|Daniel S. Dickinson||24|
Campaign[edit | edit source]
The contest in the North was between Lincoln and Douglas, but only the latter took to the stump and gave speeches and interviews. In the South, John C. Breckinridge and John Bell were the main rivals, but Douglas had an important presence in southern cities, especially among Irish Americans. Fusion tickets of the non-Republicans developed in New York and Rhode Island, and partially in New Jersey and Pennsylvania (the northern state in which Breckenridge made the best showing).
Stephen A. Douglas was the first presidential candidate in American history to undertake a nationwide speaking tour; prior to his campaign, "people saw candidates in the flesh less often than they saw a perfect rainbow". He traveled to the South where he did not expect to win many electoral votes, but he spoke for the maintenance of the Union. The dispute over the Dred Scott case had helped the Republicans easily dominate the Northern states' congressional delegations, allowing that party, although a newcomer on the political scene, easily to spread its popular influence.
Throughout the general election, Lincoln did not campaign or give speeches., This was handled by the state and county Republican organizations, who used the latest techniques to sustain party enthusiasm and thus obtain high turnout. There was little effort to convert non-Republicans, and there was virtually no campaigning in the South except for a few border cities such as St. Louis, Missouri, and Wheeling, Virginia; indeed, the party did not even run a slate in most of the South. In the North, there were thousands of Republican speakers, tons of campaign posters and leaflets, and thousands of newspaper editorials. These focused first on the party platform, and second on Lincoln's life story, making the most of his boyhood poverty, his pioneer background, his native genius, and his rise from obscurity. His nicknames, "Honest Abe" and "the Rail-Splitter," were exploited to the full. The goal was to emphasize the superior power of "free labor," whereby a common farm boy could work his way to the top by his own efforts.
The 1860 campaign was less frenzied than 1856, when the Republicans had crusaded zealously, and their opponents counter-crusaded with warnings of civil war. In 1860 every observer calculated the Republicans had an almost unbeatable advantage in the Electoral College, since they dominated almost every northern state. Republicans felt victory at hand, and used para-military campaign organizations like the Wide Awakes to rally their supporters (see American election campaigns in the 19th century for campaign techniques).
Results[edit | edit source]
The election was held on November 6. It was noteworthy for the exaggerated sectionalism of the vote in a country that was soon to dissolve into civil war. Of the eleven states that would later declare their secession from the Union, Lincoln was on the ballot only in Virginia, getting just 1.1 percent of the popular vote there. In the four slave states which did not secede (Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, and Delaware), he came in fourth in every state except Delaware (where he finished third). Lincoln won only two counties of 996 in those four states, both in Missouri. (In the 1856 election, the Republican candidate for president had received no votes at all in 13 of the 15 slave states).
The split in the Democratic Party was not a decisive factor in Lincoln's victory. Lincoln captured less than 40% of the popular vote, but almost all of his votes were concentrated in the free states, and he won every free state except for New Jersey. He won outright majorities in enough of the free states to have won the Presidency by an Electoral College vote of 169-134 even if the 60% of voters who opposed him nationally had united behind a single candidate. In New York, Rhode Island, and New Jersey, the anti-Lincoln vote did in fact combine into fusion tickets, but Lincoln still won a majority in the first two states and four electoral votes from New Jersey. The fractured Democratic vote did tip California, Oregon, and four New Jersey electoral votes to Lincoln, giving him 180 Electoral College votes. Only in California, Oregon, and Illinois was Lincoln's victory margin less than seven percent. In New England, he won every county.
Breckinridge, who was the sitting Vice-President of the United States and the only candidate to later support secession, won 11 of 15 slave states, finishing second in the Electoral College with 72 votes. He carried the border slave states of Delaware and Maryland, and nine of the eleven states that later formed the Confederacy, missing Virginia and Tennessee. However, Breckinridge received very little support in the free states, showing strength only in California, Oregon, and Pennsylvania.
Bell carried three slave states (Tennessee, Kentucky, and Virginia), finished second in the other slave states, and got tiny shares of the vote in the free states. Douglas had the most geographically widespread support, with 5-15% of the vote in most of the slave states and higher percentages in most of the free states where he was the main opposition to Lincoln. With his votes thus scattered around the country, Douglas finished second in the popular vote with 29.5% but last in the Electoral College, winning only Missouri and New Jersey.
The voter turnout rate in 1860 was the second-highest on record (81.2%, second only to 1876, with 81.8%).
Template:Start U.S. presidential ticket box Template:U.S. presidential ticket box row Template:U.S. presidential ticket box row Template:U.S. presidential ticket box row Template:U.S. presidential ticket box row Template:U.S. presidential ticket box other Template:End U.S. presidential ticket box
(a) The popular vote figures exclude South Carolina where the Electors were chosen by the state legislature rather than by popular vote.
Results by state[edit | edit source]
|Alabama||9||not on ballot||13,618||15.1||-||48,669||54.0||9||27,835||30.9||-||90,122||AL|
|Arkansas||4||not on ballot||5,357||9.9||-||28,732||53.1||4||20,063||37.0||-||54,152||AR|
|Florida||3||not on ballot||223||1.7||-||8,277||62.2||3||4,801||36.1||-||13,301||FL|
|Georgia||10||not on ballot||11,581||10.9||-||52,176||48.9||10||42,960||40.3||-||106,717||GA|
|Louisiana||6||not on ballot||7,625||15.1||-||22,681||44.9||6||20,204||40.0||-||50,510||LA|
|Mississippi||7||not on ballot||3,282||4.7||-||40,768||59.0||7||25,045||36.2||-||69,095||MS|
|New Jersey||7||58,346||48.1||4||62,869||51.9||3||partial fusion ticket with Douglas||121,215||NJ|
|New York||35||362,646||53.7||35||312,510||46.3||-||fusion ticket with Douglas||675,156||NY|
|North Carolina||10||not on ballot||2,737||2.8||-||48,846||50.5||10||45,129||46.7||-||96,712||NC|
|Rhode Island||4||12,244||61.4||4||7,707||38.6||-||fusion ticket with Douglas||19,951||RI|
|Tennessee||12||not on ballot||11,281||7.7||-||65,097||44.6||-||69,728||47.7||12||146,106||TN|
|Texas||4||not on ballot||18||0.0||-||47,454||75.5||4||15,383||24.5||-||62,855||TX|
See also[edit | edit source]
- American election campaigns in the 19th century
- Electoral history of Abraham Lincoln
- History of the United States (1849–1865)
- History of the United States Democratic Party
- History of the United States Republican Party
- Third Party System
- United States House of Representatives elections, 1860
- Wide Awakes
Notes[edit | edit source]
- Getting the Message Out! Stephen A. Douglas
- Maury Klein, Days of Defiance: Sumter, Secession, and the Coming of the Civil War pp. 27-28
- "American President:Abraham Lincoln:Campaigns and Elections". Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia. http://millercenter.org/academic/americanpresident/lincoln/essays/biography/3. Retrieved 2009-04-22.
- Benjamin P. Thomas, Abraham Lincoln, a biography (1952) p. 216; Luthin (1944); Nevins, (1950)
- "HarpWeek 1860 Election Overview". http://web.archive.org/web/20080303104104/http://elections.harpweek.com/1860/Overview-1860-2.htm.
- St. Louis County, Missouri and Gasconade County, Missouri according to http://www.missouridivision-scv.org/election.htm
- Allan Nevins, The Emergence of Lincoln: Prologue to Civil War (1950), p. 312 notes that if the opposition had formed fusion tickets in every state, Lincoln still would have 169 electoral votes; he needed 152 to win the Electoral College. Potter, The impending crisis, 1848–1861 (1976) p. 437, and Luthin, The First Lincoln Campaign p. 227 both conclude it was impossible for Lincoln's opponents to combine because they hated each other.
- "New Jersey's Vote in 1860". NY Times. 1892-12-26. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9407E0DC1638E233A25755C2A9649D94639ED7CF.
- 1860 election
- Vshadow: Lincoln's Election
References[edit | edit source]
Bibliography[edit | edit source]
- Carwardine, Richard (2003). Lincoln. Pearson Education Ltd. ISBN 9780582032798.
- Donald, David Herbert (1996) . Lincoln. New York: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 9780684825359.
- Egerton, Douglas (2010). Year of Meteors: Stephen Douglas, Abraham Lincoln, and the Election That Brought on the Civil War. Bloomsbury Press.
- Foner, Eric (1995) . Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil War. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195094978.
- Goodwin, Doris Kearns (2005). Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0684824906.
- Grinspan, Jon, "'Young Men for War': The Wide Awakes and Lincoln's 1860 Presidential Campaign," Journal of American History 96.2 (2009): online.
- Harris, William C. (2007). Lincoln's Rise to the Presidency. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 9780700615209.
- Holt, Michael F. (1978). The Political Crisis of the 1850s.
- Holzer, Harold (2004). Lincoln at Cooper Union: The Speech That Made Abraham Lincoln President. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9780743299640.
- Johannsen, Robert W. Stephen A. Douglas (1973), standard biography
- Luebke, Frederick C. (1971). Ethnic Voters and the Election of Lincoln.
- Luthin, Reinhard H. (1944). The First Lincoln Campaign. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780844612928. along with Nevins, the most detailed narrative of the election
- Mansch, Larry D. (2005). Abraham Lincoln, President-Elect: The Four Critical Months from Election to Inauguration. McFarland. ISBN 078642026X.
- Nevins, Allan (1950). Ordeal of the Union; Vol. IV: The Emergence of Lincoln: Prologue to Civil War, 1859–1861. Macmillan Publishing Company. ISBN 9780684104164.
- Nichols, Roy Franklin . The Disruption of American Democracy (1948), pp 348–506, focused on the Democratic party
- Parks, H. John Bell of Tennessee (1950), standard biography
- Potter, David M. (1976). The impending crisis, 1848–1861. HarperCollins. ISBN 9780061319297.
- Rhodes, James Ford (1920). History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850 to the McKinley-Bryan Campaign of 1896. http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=72303423. vol. 2, ch. 11. highly detailed narrative covering 1856–60
[edit | edit source]
- 1860 election: State-by-state Popular vote results
- 1860 popular vote by counties
- United States Presidential Election of 1860 in Encyclopedia Virginia
- Election of 1860
- Electoral Map from 1860
- Lincoln's election - details
- Report on 1860 Republican convention
- Overview of Constitutional Union National Convention
- How close was the 1860 election? — Michael Sheppard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Abraham Lincoln: A Resource Guide from the Library of Congress
de:Präsidentschaftswahl in den Vereinigten Staaten 1860 fa:انتخابات ریاست جمهوری آمریکا در سال ۱۸۶۰ fr:Élection présidentielle américaine de 1860 it:Elezioni presidenziali statunitensi del 1860 nl:Amerikaanse presidentsverkiezingen 1860 ja:1860年アメリカ合衆国大統領選挙 no:Presidentvalget i USA 1860 pt:Eleição presidencial dos Estados Unidos da América (1860) ro:Alegeri prezidențiale în SUA, 1860 ru:Президентские выборы в США (1860) sv:Presidentvalet i USA 1860 zh:1860年美国总统选举